Archives
BEST OF DOUG NOLAND
September 20, 2005
Traditionally, Credit booms are brought to their knees by higher
interest rates. For a system constrained by a limited supply of finance,
heightened boom-time demand for borrowings pushes up its price (market
rates). In booms of old, policy tightening would have Fed open-market
operations withdraw reserves from the banking system. This would
immediately restrict liquidity, both forcing lending rates higher and
directly imposing (reserve) restrain on the banking system as a whole.
Today, the expansive financial sector (as opposed to the "banking
system") – encompassing international banks and securities firms, the
GSEs, myriad insurers, finance companies, captive finance subsidiaries,
public mutual funds, hedge funds, pension funds, ABS, MBS, "structured
finance," central banks, and others - operates unrestrained by reserve
or capital requirements. Liquidity is dictated by the unrestricted
expansion of financial sector liabilities, with Fed operations reduced
to little more than a symbolic gesture. And the longer and larger this
Credit Bubble inflates, the greater marketplace confidence that the Fed
will not risk piercing it.
Fed assurances of ample marketplace liquidity, measured policy
responses, and unprecedented transparency have created the perfect
environment for Borrowing Short & Lending Short. Households have little
fear of variable-rate mortgages, believing that they will always enjoy
equity appreciation and the option to refinance (to negative
amortization if necessary!). The leveraged speculators beckon and Wall
Street aggressively structures products to profit from mortgage and
financial sector Credit spreads, with little concern for anything other
than measured and moderately higher mortgage rates, and no fear of
faltering liquidity or a Fed-induced housing/economy slowdown. And if
Borrowing Short & Lending Short spreads/returns appear rather meager,
well, the perceived safety of this trade guarantees that it will be put
on with greater leverage – creating only more surplus system liquidity!
Again, who loses? The loser is system stability. In the now 15-months
of Tightening Lite, the US Credit system will have added approximately
$1.5 Trillion of risky mortgage debt. Millions of households have and
continue to purchase inflated properties on highly risky mortgage terms.
Over this period, the median price of a home in California has inflated
another $73,000, with major gains in many markets nationally. Our
accumulated Current Account Deficit over the six quarters of Tightening
Lite has surpassed $900 billion. The prices of crude and natural gas
have both almost doubled, while inflationary pressures are broadening.
Unprecedented global liquidity has fueled debt, equity and real estate
booms encompassing markets large and small, developed and developing.
It’s become a runway global Credit Bubble….
Going forward, short-term rates need to move higher and, likely,
considerably higher to rein in today’s destabilizing real estate and
securities lending and speculative excesses. And to those arguing that
the system is too fragile and housing too vulnerable for higher rates, I
can only respond by reiterating that there is today no way of avoiding
the bursting of the US Mortgage Finance, Credit and economic Bubbles. |