Archives
BEST OF DOUG NOLAND
June 2, 2005
It is becoming more challenging for Mr. Greenspan to downplay the
significance what has developed all throughout the nation’s "local"
housing markets. And, right along with his fellow inflationists, the
environment is forcing him into increasingly clever analytical nonsense.
There is clearly a national Mortgage Finance Bubble and a Nationwide
Housing Mania. As such, it is today disingenuous to split hairs on the
moot issue of a "national housing Bubble."
Why on earth would anyone care to "arbitrage" home "prices between
Portland, Maine and Portland, Oregon"? The easiest way to speculate on
continued housing inflation is to buy the most expensive home one could
possibly afford, or to buy as many of as possible. And there is ample
evidence that this is being done in excess in communities throughout the
country. And the rationalization that "one of the considerable barriers
to achieving realized capital gains on the sale of a home is if
you live there you have to move" ignores today’s reality that
speculators can easily extract inflating "equity" with the help of their
accommodating banker or mortgage broker.
Perhaps "nonsense" is too strong, so I will use "wishful thinking" to
describe the very non-central banker-like comment that "People are
reaching… which leads me to conclude that this big price surge is going
to soon simmer down." That’s particularly poor Bubble analysis, Mr.
Greenspan. With respect to housing inflation, mortgage rates are
significantly below any notion of a "Neutral Rate." Expect the Mortgage
Finance Bubble to continue to surprise and amaze.
And, back to nonsense rationalizing, Mr. Greenspan’s theorizing that
desire for "our own special types of idiosyncratic homes" as a factor
helping to explain housing inflation falls rather flat with respect to
the 50% two-year California condominium price spike and the spectacular
Miami condo mania. And history will not be kind to the view "that even
if there are declines in prices, the significant run up to date has so
increased equity in homes that only those who have purchased just before
prices…go down are going to have problems." The confluence of atypical
price spikes, enormous and unrelenting equity extraction, huge churning
(originations likely surpassing $2.5 Trillion this year), and risky
late-cycle borrowing terms assure the coming proliferation of underwater
homeowners.
And to the comment - "the presumption that there are a lot of
bankruptcies out there doesn’t seem credible to any of my associates and
myself" - I can only suggest that it is too early in the game to be so
sanguine. It’s like saying in mid-1999 that warnings of massive losses
in technology stocks and a telecom debt collapse lacked credibility. The
extent of losses that arise with the bursting of Bubbles has very much
to do with the degree of excess and duration of the speculative blow-off
period. We all better hope and pray that the Fed doesn’t buy into the
inflationists "Neutral Rate" fallacy. |