Archives
BEST OF DOUG NOLAND
May 9, 2007
I tend to view gross distortions emanating from (now out of control)
global systemic liquidity excess as today’s critical issue. From this
perspective, the unparalleled $500bn (or so) y-t-d increase in foreign
central bank reserves is indicative of the inverse of 1998’s
liquidity-constricting biases and dis-inflationary forces. Today,
powerful expansionary biases foment only greater financial excess and
historic asset and commodities inflation. At this point, the risk of
irreparable system damage comes not from an unwind of leveraged
speculations, but rather an all-encompassing frenzied expansion of
global finance. About the only "de-leveraging" likely in this
environment is buying associated with the covering of bearish hedges and
speculations. One can think liquidity excess-induced marketplace
dislocation or, perhaps, Mises’ "crackup boom" on a synchronized
international scale.
Undoubtedly, such incredible excess sets the stage for an eventual
devastating reversal of financial flows. While the inflated "Periphery"
is no doubt vulnerable, the wildly distorted "Core" is at great and
escalating danger. Here, also, it is helpful to compare and contrast the
late-nineties to today. Back then, chairman Greenspan and his "committee
to save the world" had some distinct advantages that Mr. Bernanke will
not enjoy. First, maturing "King dollar" gave the Fed great leeway to "reliquefy"
and reflate. Second, the global disinflationary backdrop allowed global
central bankers to loosen policies in an unprecedented fashion without
worry of negative inflationary consequences. Third, as the world’s sole
financial and economic "locomotive" at the time, U.S. monetary policy
had significant sway over global energy, commodities and goods prices.
Fourth, Asian, Russian, and "developing" economy central banks were
desperate to build dollar reserves to protect against future currency
runs. Fifth, the ("unaccountable") GSEs were in aggressive balance sheet
expansion mode. Six, the U.S. Mortgage Finance Bubble had not yet
financed an historic housing inflation, encouraged U.S. households to
take on incredible amounts of debt, and thoroughly distorted risk
markets. And, seven, derivative markets were not approaching $400 TN,
with incomprehensible risks and ramifications.
In short, the Fed (overseer of the world’s reserve currency) has lost
both its control over the inflationary process and its consequences, as
well as its flexibility to respond to events. Admittedly, these
extremely important developments are lost in today’s liquidity
onslaught. When the eventual reversal of flows and dislocation arrives,
it should be expected to have profound effects on the maladjusted U.S.
economy and fragile U.S. and global Credit systems. I’ll venture a
prediction that hedge fund de-leveraging will pale in comparison to the
widespread tumult that will likely engulf currency, securitization, and
derivatives markets – in risk intermediation generally. The derivatives
markets are poised to falter into absolute liquidity nightmares, and
this will not be a hedge fund-like de-leveraging issue easily resolved
with aggressive rate cuts. And the longer current destabilizing flows
are allowed to run roughshod – distorting prices, risk perceptions, and
economic structures in the process - the more arduous the unavoidable
adjustment period. That’s just the way it works.
Doug Noland is a market strategist at Prudent Bear Funds. Their
website is www.prudentbear.com. |