Investment Rarities Incorporated
History |  Q & A  |  Endorsements  |  Portfolios  | Flatware | Gold Coins  |  Silver Coins  |  Contact |  Home

Products

Jim Cook

 

RUNAWAY SOCIAL SYMPATHY

Every once in a while I switch the TV channel from Fox to CNBC to see what the liberals are saying.  After listening awhile I get a deep sense of hopelessness and foreboding for our country.  The most important thing for the left is giving money to people.  They are happy to see the growth of food stamps, disability payments, housing subsidies, free healthcare and all the other welfare benefits.  They utterly fail to see the damage it is doing to the recipients.  Whole cities that once flourished have deteriorated into rotting eyesores populated with shambling hulks of chemically dependent drones.  These people are no longer employable.  They have become incompetent and helpless and the liberals can’t see that it’s their doing.

..Read More »

The Best of Jim Cook Archive

 
Ted Butler Commentary
May 11, 2009
archive

tb archive
print

A Presidential Bombshell

(This essay was written by silver analyst Theodore Butler, an independent consultant. Investment Rarities does not necessarily endorse these views, which may or may not prove to be correct.)

I’ve just learned something about silver that I was only vaguely familiar with previously, and I’d like to share it with you. It had a big impact on me. When I shared it with my friend and mentor, Izzy Friedman, the person who first got me interested in silver, he said it was something he never knew and he called it a bombshell. I can tell you that Izzy doesn’t use that term often. As always, I’ll let you decide for yourself.

One reason I was only vaguely familiar with the subject was because it dates back 44 years, to 1965. I was only 18 years old and had just graduated from high school. I was thinking about college, the Vietnam War, the rest of my life, cars and girls, though not necessarily in that order. I was definitely not thinking about silver. Izzy hadn’t even come to America yet and also thought nothing about silver. Most of you reading this may not have been born then, as the median age in this country is under 37. Even if you are 80 years-old today, you were only 36 in 1965. In a lot of ways, 44 years is a very long time ago.

In historical terms, of course, 44 years is almost a blink of the eye. It’s all about putting things in perspective. Just like time, who may say something, even if it’s the exact same thing being said as someone else, alters our perspective about the message. This applies to silver as well. I suppose many expect me to say bullish things about silver, because I do so regularly. Even though I always try to present hard evidence and the facts, and I am sincere in my presentation (and mostly correct), let’s face it - it’s somewhat expected when I conclude that silver is a great investment. But I would imagine it would be somewhat shocking, even a bombshell, if the President of the United States said what I have been saying about silver. No, not President Obama, as he was only three years-old in 1965.

Thanks to a poster on the Internet (hat-tip to Cajun Coin), I had the opportunity to read the speech that President Lyndon Johnson made on July 23, 1965, in which he announced the US Government’s plan to remove silver from coinage. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=27108 I had not read the speech before. The President said this was the first change in our nation’s coinage in 173 years, since the very first Coinage Act of 1792. Talk about historical.

Allow me to excerpt the pertinent sections of the President’s speech. Please remember that these are his words, not mine:

"Now, all of you know these changes are necessary for a very simple reason--silver is a scarce material. Our uses of silver are growing as our population and our economy grows. The hard fact is that silver consumption is now more than double new silver production each year. So, in the face of this worldwide shortage of silver, and our rapidly growing need for coins, the only really prudent course was to reduce our dependence upon silver for making our coins.

If we had not done so, we would have risked chronic coin shortages in the very near future.

Some have asked whether our silver coins will disappear. The answer is very definitely-no.

Our present silver coins won't disappear and they won't even become rarities. We estimate that there are now 12 billion--I repeat, more than 12 billion silver dimes and quarters and half dollars that are now outstanding. We will make another billion before we halt production. And they will be used side-by-side with our new coins.

Since the life of a silver coin is about 25 years, we expect our traditional silver coins to be with us in large numbers for a long, long time.

If anybody has any idea of hoarding our silver coins, let me say this. Treasury has a lot of silver on hand, and it can be, and it will be used to keep the price of silver in line with its value in our present silver coin. There will be no profit in holding them out of circulation for the value of their silver content."

President Johnson’s words were unnerving to me, as I used them repeatedly over the years, completely unaware of this speech. The President of the United States, arguably the most powerful man in the world, using words like, "scarce," "shortage," and the need to reduce silver consumption for money. From an analyst, we expect discussions of silver production and consumption shortfalls and growing population and economic growth. But from a President?

The fact is that President Johnson and his economic team at the Treasury Department were proved both remarkably correct and incorrect with the passage of time. They were spot on in their fear that the demand for silver and the inability of production to meet that demand would soon deplete US inventories. They were dead wrong in their expectation that the US Government could hold down silver prices and prevent investors from making a profit. In just a few years, most silver coins were removed from circulation by investors. In less than 15 years, the price of silver rose from $1.29 at the time of the President’s speech to more than $50 in early-1980.

The speech prompted me to reflect and dig deeper into the facts. I hope it has the same effect on you. The deeper I looked, the more compelling the silver story became. It always does. Here are the facts, using the Silver Institute and others as data source, followed by my conclusions.

Six years earlier, in 1959, the US Treasury Department held approximately 2.1 billion ounces in silver bullion inventories plus 1.3 billion ounces in circulating coinage, for a total of 3.4 billion ounces. By 1971, through a combination of outright bullion sales and use in new coinage, the Treasury held only 170 million ounces of silver bullion and most silver coins were removed by investors from circulating coinage and eventually melted into bullion. More than 3.2 billion ounces of silver were transferred from the US Government to the private sector, over this 12 year period, or around 94% of what the government controlled. Much of this silver was consumed in industrial and other fabrication during this time period. Eventually, all the transferred silver would be so consumed.

1959 would be the last year the US Government would be a buyer of silver, as it had been for decades, until 2001, when it began buying silver for the American Eagle and commemorative coin programs. In 1959, when the US Government held 3.4 billion ounces of silver, the US population was approximately 180 million. That means the Government held almost 19 ounces of silver, for every man, woman and child in the nation. Today it holds none. This also means that the US Government can never be a physical silver seller again, until and unless it buys silver first.

Here’s a statistic that is stunning and troublesome at the same time. In 1959, there were about 5 billion ounces of silver physically held on US soil. This includes the 3.4 billion Government holdings plus privately held silver, including hundreds of millions of ounces of silver objects that would be subsequently melted in the early 1980’s. Today, I think I may be exaggerating if I say there are more than 300 million ounces held on US soil, including all the 118 million ounces in COMEX-approved warehouses and privately held silver. Before you disagree, please remember that the more than 400 million ounces in ETF-type vehicles are held outside the US. If my numbers are accurate (as I believe them to be), then the amount of physical silver held on US soil is down 94% in 50 years.

In 1959, there were about 9 billion ounces of silver bullion-equivalent in the world (half of that in the US, both public and private). With a world population of 3 billion, there was a per-capita amount of 3 ounces for each of the world’s citizens. Today, 50 years later, there is a per capita amount of silver of 0.15 of an ounce remaining (1 billion ounces divided by 6.8 billion population).

That is not a misprint. The per-capita amount of silver bullion equivalent in the world has declined by 95% over the past 50 years. By way of comparison, the per-capita amount of gold bullion equivalent in the world has remained remarkably stable at around three-quarters of an ounce per person, for more than 100 years. In 1900, there were around 1 billion ounces of gold versus a world population of 1.5 billion. In 1959, there were about 2.3 billion ounces of gold against a world population of 3 billion. Today there are roughly 5 billion gold ounces and 6.8 billion people.

I make these comparisons with gold, not to bad-mouth gold. I make them to provide a legitimate perspective. I make the comparisons because gold and silver are the perfect items to compare. I make them to show how undervalued silver is, not that gold is overvalued. In spite of evidence of manipulation, gold has done what it has been expected to do - it has kept pace with inflation and money and population growth. That’s proven by it’s price increase over the past 50 years and it’s incredibly stable per-capita amount in existence. Since 1959, gold has increased in price more than 25-fold ($35 to $900).

It’s a much different story in silver. Yes, silver has increased in price by more than fifteen-fold in 50 years ($.90 to $14), but that’s only half the comparison story. The other half is that 90% of the silver in the world has been vaporized over that time, put into forms that may or may not ever be recoverable, even at shockingly high prices. This, at the same time the amount of gold in existence has doubled. Yet the price of gold rose from 30 times the price of silver back then to more than 85 times last fall, and today is still double what it was 50 years ago. Only two reasons can account for this - a manipulation in silver and a global unawareness of these facts. I guarantee you that both reasons will be terminated in time.

The US Government and other nations around the world didn’t remove silver from coinage for any reason other than there wasn’t enough silver available. President Johnson’s words are crystal clear. They knew they couldn’t keep issuing coins pegged at an artificially low price. They were correct. But what no one knew 50 years ago was that even if the world stopped using silver as money, we would still run out of silver because of industrial demand. Even the investors in the 1960’s who bought and took away from the US Government the 3 billion+ ounces didn’t buy silver with an eye towards the day when silver inventories would be depleted by industrial consumption. Please allow me to explain.

The investors in the 1960’s who bought the silver from the government did so because it was an almost a no-lose proposition. Those who removed silver coins from circulation were further fortified with the knowledge that the face value of the coins provided a floor, making coins a no-risk proposition. Intuitively, investors back then knew that silver prices were artificially depressed by government dumping. They also knew the silver dumping had to end at some point. And it did, when the government depleted its inventory. Then prices rose and those early and intuitive investors did what made sense: they took profits and sold. Why not, as they doubled and tripled their investment, in a few years, with little to no risk?

Because the early investors sold what silver they bought or withdrew from coin circulation, the silver that was originally taken away from the US Government was in turn taken away from the early investors, albeit at a sizable profit to them. And who took it away from the early investors? The answer is not a who, but a what. What took the silver away was growing world population and industrial and fabrication demand over the next 40 years. My point is simple - whereas many billions of silver existed in the world 50 years ago, very little of that, maybe 10%, remains today.

So what can we conclude from all of this? First, that huge and verifiable inventories of silver did exist back then, and they no longer exist, due to decades of a continuous structural deficit. These former silver inventories are not hiding, they are gone. No longer can the US Government (or any other) dump massive amounts of silver on the market. Let’s face it - back then, the US Government was openly manipulating and controlling the price of silver, by selling at fixed prices. When they ran out of silver to sell, the manipulation and control ended in a flash and prices exploded.

Today, the manipulation is different. No longer is the US Government selling physical supplies at fixed prices. Instead, a Government-protected entity, most likely JPMorgan, sells paper silver contracts at artificially depressed prices. I contend that this abhorrent paper manipulation will vanish in a flash at some point, just like the Government physical manipulation of 50 years ago. Only this time the impact on the market and the rewards to investors will be greater, precisely because there is so little silver remaining.

Consider these facts. Back then, the US Government was the world’s largest silver seller. Today, the Government is a large buyer, perhaps the largest in the world, through the American Eagle and Commemorative silver programs. This year, the US Mint is on pace to produce and sell over 30 million ounces of Silver Eagles and other silver coins. Because the Government holds no silver and must buy on the open market, this makes the Mint a very large consumer, perhaps the largest in the world. Incredibly, just this buying by the Mint alone uses up 80% of what the US produces in a year, as the world’s eighth largest silver producing country.

Finally, it’s not just that the world had many billions of silver ounces then and does not have them anymore. It’s not just that the world economy and population will grow over time, demanding more silver than ever before. It’s not just the fact that most of the new technologies require silver’s unique qualities, like never before. It’s not just that the paper manipulation on the COMEX is becoming more apparent and less feared. There is something else that runs through my head when I contemplate President Johnson’s words and observing what took place over the past half-century.

The 1960’s were a simpler time. Communication and knowledge didn’t travel as fast back then, as it does now. It won’t take long for the world to focus on the silver story, once prices begin to reflect true value. Fifty years ago, we didn’t have a small fraction of the amount of investment money in existence as we do today. We didn’t have the concentrated pools of investment money looking for home, including hedge and sovereign wealth funds. We didn’t have then the surge of government simulative money being created as we do today. It’s impossible to imagine that given how the world is structured today and how much investment money exists versus how little silver remains, that we won’t have the greatest price explosion as the facts become known. Remember, it’s not about the facts turning in silver’s favor. It’s about investors becoming educated to the facts.

* * * * * *

As a quick housekeeping note, many of you have written to me about reports of big COMEX call option buying in gold and silver, by JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. While I think it is possible that there has been buying in gold and silver mining shares and perhaps in the OTC market, there has been no evidence of such option buying on the COMEX, according to public data in the COT and Bank Participation Reports. If there were such buying on the COMEX, it would be reflected in these public reports.