BEST OF JIM COOK
December 21, 2006
THE ROAD TO RUIN
Our central bank controls the issuance of money (and credit). There’s
no competition. This monopoly on money becomes a tool for politicians to
pay the bills for ever-expanding social programs and military escapades.
It’s called inflating. If government spends too much, they cover the
deficit by printing or creating new money.
Without inflating, social programs can’t expand. Thus the creation of
new money became an indispensable ingredient to the goals of populist
politicians. Easy money aids the spread of liberal policies and big
government. Inflating and socialism go hand in hand – you can’t have one
without the other. The left in this country has an open-ended commitment
to supporting the rapidly growing underclass. Helping the poor has
become a huge growth industry, providing scores of government jobs and
growing political muscle. Call it the poverty business. When we pay for
our runaway social spending by creating new money to pay the bills, we
water down the value of our money. Eventually it’s the road to
depression, hyperinflation and national ruin.
The underclass of every race costs the nation an astronomical sum. It
used to be that a public defender was a part-time duty in most
communities. Now there are scores of these lawyers on city and county
payrolls earning in the high five figures. Facilities for incarceration,
prison and jail guards, probation officers, judges and court employees
all have exploded in number. Two million children now have parents in
prison.
The underclass was cemented into place years ago with the advent of
the dole. Since then a blizzard of social programs, including public
housing, food stamps, welfare payments, medical care, heating bill
payments, homeowner grants and a dizzying number of lesser programs have
been introduced to ease their struggle and keep them uninterested in
personal achievement. As a byproduct, 25 million fathers have turned
support of their children over to the government.
Consider the plight of North America’s indigenous people. After a
century of government assistance, the human condition on the reservation
is worse than anything that ever existed on the planet. Have we learned
anything from converting these once highly self-sufficient people into
helplessness? Not at all. Social sympathy still runs amuck. Liberals
remain oh so compassionate, especially when spending money that isn’t
their own.
The Fed will do everything in its power to keep inflating, even while
it claims to be fighting inflation with tiny raises in the interest
rates. The economist Murray Rothbard saw through this. "…the drumfire of
propaganda that the Fed is manning the ramparts against the menace of
inflation brought about by others is nothing less than a deceptive shell
game. The culprit solely responsible for inflation, the Federal Reserve,
is continually engaged in raising a hue-and-cry about ‘inflation,’ for
which virtually everyone else in society seems to be responsible.
What we are seeing is the old ploy by the robber who starts shouting
‘Stop, thief!’ and runs down the street pointing ahead to others."
We must either inflate or face deflation and a credit collapse. We
are not going to take the necessary, but bitter, deflationary medicine
now. However, the consequences are profound. London Times Editor William
Rees-Mogg wrote, "Inflation gradually pushes the whole community towards
speculation, since ordinary life begins to require speculator’s skills."
The free market thinker, Henry Hazlitt summarized, "In a free enterprise
system, with an honest and stable money, there is dominantly a close
link between effort and productivity, on the one hand, and economic
reward on the other. Inflation severs this link. Reward comes to depend
less and less on effort and production, and more and more on successful
gambling and luck."
Another great monetary thinker, Elgin Groseclose, explained the
process we’ve employed in America for many decades. "By mortgaging the
future, pledging the productive power of unopened mines, uncut forests,
unbuilt factories and unborn generations, a tremendous demand may be
created for wares already produced in the markets."
When you hear the media and left-wing politicians renouncing
business, it brings to mind Henry Hazlitt’s explanation. "A period of
inflation is almost inevitably also a period when demagogy and an
antibusiness mentality are rampant. If implacable enemies of the country
had deliberately set out to undermine and destroy the incentives of the
middle classes to work and save, they could hardly have contrived a more
effective set of weapons than the present combination of inflation,
subsidies, handouts, and confiscatory taxes that our own politicians
have imposed upon us."
If we keep expanding credit, there comes a time when too many people
no longer want to hold the money. They want to exchange it for goods and
assets. Quite suddenly prices begin to run away and nobody wants to hold
dollars because they are depreciating too fast. The economist Hans
Sennholz said it best. "The ultimate destination of the present road of
political fiat is hyperinflation with all its ominous economic, social,
and political consequences. On this road, no federal plan, program,
incomes policy, control, nationalization, threat, fine, or prison can
prevent the continuous erosion and ultimate destruction of the dollar."
The Fed feverishly pumps out additional money and credit to forestall
a collapse. It’s an unhealthy system where only more debt can save us.
Dan Denning described this perverse predicament. "The scope of the debt
problem in America hasn’t been fully understood. The single
distinguishing feature of the current version of American capitalism is
credit creation. So much debt has been created in the last twenty years
that it requires huge amounts of new credit simply to keep the system
liquid. The necessity for ever-larger amounts of credit to keep the
system liquid weighs on the ability of the Fed to reflate. It’s like
pouring more and more water in the bathtub with a big hole in the
bottom."
It’s interesting to read what Andrew Dickinson White wrote about the
great French inflation in the 18th century that destroyed the
currency and economy of France, and compare his comments to the monetary
expansion of today. "Whenever a great quantity of paper money is
suddenly issued, we invariably see a rapid increase of trade. The great
quantity of the circulating medium sets in motion all the energies of
commerce and manufacturers; capital for investment is more easily found
than usual, and trade perpetually receives fresh nutriment."
He describes the consequences. "There arose the clamor for more paper
money. At first, new issues were made with great difficulty; but, the
dike once broken, the current of irredeemable currency poured through;
and swollen beyond control. It was urged on by speculators for a rise in
values; by demagogues who persuaded the mob that a nation, by its simple
fiat, could stamp real value to any amount upon valueless objects. As a
natural consequence, a great debtor class grew rapidly, and this class
gave its influence to depreciate more and more the currency in which its
debts were to be paid. The government now began, and continued by spasms
to grind out still more paper; commerce was at first stimulated by the
difference in exchange; but this cause soon ceased to operate, and
commerce, having been stimulated unhealthfully, wasted away.
Manufacturers at first received a great impulse; but, ere long, this
overproduction and overstimulus proved as fatal to them as to commerce.
"A still worse outgrowth was the increase of speculation and
gambling… For at the great metropolitan centers grew a luxurious,
speculative stock-gambling body, which, like a malignant tumor, absorbed
into itself the strength of the nation and sent out its cancerous fibers
to the remotest hamlets. At these city centers abundant wealth seemed to
be piled up. In the country at large there grew a dislike of steady
labor and a contempt for moderate gains and simple living.
Mr. White continued, "… how easy it is to issue it; how difficult it
is to check its overissue; how seductively it leads to the absorption of
the means of the working men and men of small fortunes; how heavily it
falls on all those living on fixed incomes, salaries, or wages; how
securely it creates, on the ruins of the prosperity of all men of meager
means, a class of debauched speculators, the most injurious class that a
nation can harbor – more injurious, indeed, than professional criminals
whom the law recognizes and can throttle; how it stimulates
overproduction at first and leaves every industry flaccid afterward; how
it breaks down thrift and develops political and social immorality."
Are we any smarter about economics and monetary affairs today? We
have highly educated men in charge, considered to be brilliant. Mr.
White wrote, "The men who had charge of French finance….. were
universally recognized as among the most skillful and honest financiers
in Europe."