BEST OF JIM COOK
January 23, 2007
BITING THE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU
A new version of the film, "Manchurian Candidate," replaces the old
movie’s Korean War villains with a new set of wrongdoers, the managers
of a mutual fund. It’s totally preposterous. The evil company,
Manchurian Equities, implants devices in the brains of innocent soldiers
to make them kill the newly elected U.S. president. The old movie was
good, but the goofy addition of an equity fund as the villain ruins the
new movie. The Hollywood left insists on painting business persons as
arch criminals, even though it’s ridiculous. They like to depict free
enterprise, capitalism and business leaders as a source of evil and
criminality. Somehow they think that will influence enough people to
further their left-wing agenda.
If it would do any good, someone should read them Llewellyn Rockwell,
Jr.’s case for capitalism. "The market economy has created unfathomable
prosperity and, decade by decade, century by century, miraculous feats
of innovation, production, distribution, and social coordination. To the
free market, we owe all material prosperity, all leisure time, our
health and longevity, our huge and growing population and nearly
everything we call life itself. Capitalism, and capitalism alone, has
rescued the human race from degrading poverty, rampant sickness, and
early death."
Lew Rockwell runs the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama.
Over the weekend I read his excellent book, "Speaking of Liberty." He
explains why so much hostility exists towards business. "Whether in the
arts, entertainment, or academia, the dominant players are talented
people who believe that they are wiser and better than the masses. They
are appalled that capitalism permits a B-school dropout to become a
billionaire while they scrape by for a measly raise when promoted from
assistant to associate professor. They set out to cripple the system
that brings this about."
And what does this envy lead to? Rockwell continues, "Outside of one
or two economics professors, nearly the entire liberal arts faculty of
the typical university is reliably anticapitalist. As a class, liberal
arts academics can be depended on to oppose economic development,
support high taxes, and latch on to every anti-enterprise cause that
comes along."
Economist, Thomas Sowell writes, "Think about the things that have
improved our lives the most over the past century – medical advances,
the transportation revolution, huge increases in consumer goods,
dramatic improvements in housing, the computer revolution. The people
who created these things – the doers – are not popular heroes. Our
heroes are the talkers who complain about the doers."
He continues, "There was a time when most people lived and died
within a 50-mile radius of where they were born. The automobile opened a
whole new world to these people. It also enabled those living in
overcrowded cities to spread out into suburbs and get some elbow room.
Trucks got goods to people more cheaply and ambulances got people to
hospitals to save their lives. Yet who among the people who did this are
today regarded as being as big a hero as Ralph Nader, who put himself on
the map with complaints about cars in general and the Corvair in
particular? Hard data on automobile safety and tests conducted on the
Corvair both undermined Nader’s claims. But he will always be a hero to
the talkers."
Lew Rockwell points out, "The philosopher who strolls around
speculating on the meaning of life is seen as the highest form of
humanity, while the man who risks his own money to make available food,
shelter, medicine, clothing, and all the other material goods that make
life livable is despised."
Animosity towards the merchant class has been around for centuries.
Why? The goal of making a profit is quite obviously a self-serving
motive. Other occupations, while equally self-serving, are better able
to hide their motives. Even though a merchant must provide services for
others in order to profit, that part of the equation is overlooked.
They’re condemned for making a profit.
Lew Rockwell explains how well this profit system works, "It balances
human needs with the availability of all the world’s resources,
unleashes the amazing power of human creativity, and works to meet the
material needs of every member of society at the least possible cost. It
does this through exchange, cooperation, competition, entrepreneurship,
and all the institutions that make possible capitalism – the most
productive economic system this side of heaven."
Not long ago I read an article about China and the kind of heroes
they glorify in their media. They write about entrepreneurs and business
leaders. Contrast that with our hero worship of hip-hop musicians and
dysfunctional movie stars. You can read newspaper and magazine articles
endlessly about athletes, politicians and entertainers, but not business
people (except for a handful, like Martha Stewart, who get into
trouble). Do you have any doubts that the Asians will outdo us?