|
Archives
WEEKLY COMMENTARY
October 22, 2002
Here We Go Again
By Theodore Butler
(The following essay was written by silver analyst
Theodore Butler. Investment Rarities does not necessarily endorse these
views, which may or may not prove to be correct.)
Prices of silver have come down again, to the lower end of the roughly
low $4 to low $5 range that it seems like we have been locked in
forever. There is no doubt that patience has been a requisite for silver
investors. Low prices are an irritant to existing holders, but a
blessing to those accumulating. The price is known to all, and how we
deal with it and feel about it is a personal matter. One thing that
invariably develops in just about every silver investor's mind, at times
like these, is to reevaluate the facts behind the metal. Don't worry,
this will be a quick review.
First and foremost, silver is still operating in a deficit. That is,
every single day, we consume more of the metal than we produce. That
means that every single day, we have less above ground silver inventory
in existence in the world than the day before. This has been occurring
for 60 years, and doesn't appear to be about to change any time soon, at
current prices. This means that we have, at a bare bones minimum, less
above ground silver in the world, than we had 60 years ago. In reality,
we have less above ground silver in the world than we had hundreds of
years ago, thanks to the fact that we have eaten up those inventories of
60 years ago in satisfying the structural deficit, and those inventories
took the world hundreds, if not thousands, of years to accumulate. Based
upon the wide variety of uses of silver to modern life, growing daily,
and the practical constraints to taking it from the ground (mainly the
low price), this condition promises to continue. Like all industrial
minerals, the fundamentals of silver are as easy to change as making a
U-turn in a supertanker.
I offer this brief review to hopefully balance what is an ingrained
human condition, namely, when the price of any investment item declines,
any bearish stories sound more plausible. Just like, when prices rise,
bullish stories are granted more credence. While that human condition
will never vanish, recognizing its existence, and dealing with it as
logically as possible, should be the goal of any thinking investor. In
silver, of the many recent bearish sounding stories that seem to suggest
that the recent price decline is here to stay, two popular ones come to
mind - what if there is no deficit and what about the flood of silver
from Red China?
What if the statistics are wrong, since they are so hard to keep anyway,
and we don't have a deficit after all? To this, I answer that the vast
majority of input of the statistics comes from public companies and
official government statistics (like export/import figures),
cross-checked by any number of independent public and private
organizations over many years. And even if that is not good enough for
you, let me offer knockout proof that the long term silver structural
deficit is real. In a commodity deficit, by definition, inventories must
be reduced by the amount of the deficit. In silver, I can point to a
couple of simple inventory statistics that confirm the long-term
structural deficit. For one, there is the US Government. Uncle Sam had 6
billion ounces at the start of World War II, 60 years ago, the largest
known stockpile of silver in the history of the world. The US is now
officially tap-city in silver and a buyer for the first time in many,
many years. The 6 billion is gone. Oh, we may have a couple of hundred
million ounces kicking around in old coins, but the vast bulk is gone.
By the way, 6 billion over 60 years, is 100 million ounces per year,
which not coincidentally, mirrors the size of the annual amount of the
long-term structural deficit. In addition, the current largest known
stockpile of silver in the world, the warehouses licensed by the COMEX,
had 350 million ounces in 1993 (adjusted for additions from the Delaware
warehouses). Those COMEX stockpiles have dropped 70% to around 110
million currently. Think about that for a moment. The two best known
inventories in the world are down 100% for the biggest and 70% for the
next biggest. Combined, the two most widely known and trusted
inventories of silver have been depleted by more than 98%. Don't you
think that confirms that we have had a deficit in silver? Of course, as
I have asked repeatedly over the past couple of years, if anyone can
document a lot of silver out there, please let me hear from you.
Now to China. There is a lot of talk about silver coming from China. Too
much talk, if you ask me. I'm a commodity guy, and have been for over 30
years. I must tell you, I have never seen the volume and detail that is
given to this China silver export talk, on any other commodity that
China produces or consumes, which means all commodities. Try to get
detailed import and export statistics on any commodity from Red China.
It is extremely difficult. But not with silver, where it seems we get
daily bulletins. It smells fishy to me. My common sense tells me
something's wrong. These reports have China exporting more than their
entire silver mine production. We know China is a very, very large
consumer of silver (just like they are a very large consumer of oil,
copper and other base metals, food, electricity, etc.), because they
have almost 25% of the world's people. So, it is fair to assume that any
exports of silver coming from China are coming from existing stockpiles,
not as a result of a net surplus of current production. A few
observations - one, selling (probably leasing) from stockpiles can't be
a continuous process, as stockpile sales are finite in nature. Two, why
is Red China dumping silver now, for the first time in modern history,
at the lowest inflation adjusted prices in all of history? They
certainly don't need the export earnings, as they generate the largest
trade surplus in the world, and silver proceeds are minuscule. Are they
all of a sudden stupid? Or perhaps they are sending out intentional
false signals, so they can accumulate a commodity that they see is in a
critical shortage. Verified information is hard to come by, stories are
plentiful. My point in all this is simple - even if silver is coming
from China to satisfy the deficit, think of how bizarre and bullish that
is. It has come down to the world depending on Red China, of all
countries, to perhaps balance the silver deficit, even though China does
not produce more silver than it consumes. Who do we go to next for
silver - Iraq?
But if silver is not down in price because of China or because we don't
have a deficit, then why is it down? Silver is down because of the
continued manipulative trading practices on the COMEX, the worlds
largest, and I would claim, only silver exchange. Please allow me to try
and prove my allegation, one more time, and at the same time, bring you
some very good news. I will base my proof on the weekly Commitments of
Traders Report (COT), issued by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(CFTC).
As you probably are aware, I had conducted a campaign
this year, starting in February, to try and convince the CFTC that the
price of silver was being manipulated by unfair and illegal trade
practices on the COMEX. Because so many of you participated in that
campaign, the CFTC and the COMEX were forced to respond. While they
denied a manipulation existed (I say because the alternative, admission,
was unthinkable), I wrote that there may have been some action taken
behind the scenes. A few months ago, I also wrote that we would know if
my speculation was correct, depending upon the behavior of the
ever-controlling dealers on the next real rally. If, on the next rally,
the dealers sold in the price-capping uneconomic quantities that they
had in the past (when 4 or less traders sold net short 260 million
ounces, and 8 or less sold 350 million) the rally would be contained and
the manipulation would live on. If the dealers didn't sell, the price
would explode beyond belief. Since we have not had that rally yet, the
jury is still out on the verdict. But the day of decision draws near.
In the most recent COT, issued Oct 18, 2002, the price-controlling
dealers appear to be very close to having bought back the entire
price-capping net short sale that they maintained most of the year. This
was exactly their plan and what I had warned about (to no avail) in a
dozen letters to the CFTC. Even though I don't shy from calling them
crooks, the dealers' manipulation of the silver market must be viewed
with awe. The latest COT shows that the dealers have covered almost 80%
of the total net short position they held at the market top in the
summer, or almost 60,000 contracts out of a peak net short position of
over 75,000 contracts. In ounces, the dealers have covered almost 300
million ounces of their total net short of 375 million ounces net short.
For sure, the ring-leading 4 and 8 largest traders have also covered
like amounts.
Stop and think about those numbers for a minute. I say that proves that
paper games by the big speculators and dealer-speculators on the COMEX
are controlling and manipulating the price. Here's why - a lot of people
point to China, for instance, for being responsible for the current low
prices because China is dumping silver on the world market. The amount
that China is said to be dumping? 30 to 60 million ounces a year, or 2.5
to 5 million ounces a month. Yet, a US agency, the CFTC, has reported
that in just three months, paper contracts, in the amount of 300 million
ounces, or 100 million per month, were dumped on the COMEX. This is not
just volume, mind you, this is actual ownership of contracts being
transferred. Hell, world mine production only runs 50 million ounces a
month, yet the CFTC blindly reports 100 million COMEX ounces transferred
between concentrated hands. I can assure you that this sick and bizarre
circumstance does not exist in any other traded commodity - just sick
COMEX silver. You tell me - which amount do you think has the greatest
price impact - the maybe 5 million monthly from China, the 50 million oz
monthly spread out among all the mining companies in the world, or the
100 million monthly concentrated in a few crooks' hands? That is not a
trick question.
It is this glaring mismatch of amounts of silver that changes hands in
the real world, and that which transpires on the COMEX, that proves
conclusively that the COMEX is rigging the price of silver. How could it
not? It is also the obscene, concentrated and coordinated amount of
silver that is contracted on the COMEX that renders any talk of
legitimate hedging as silly. It is also why the CFTC, nor the COMEX,
can't verify that real silver exists to back up the concentrated paper
dealings on the COMEX. Of course, the reason lies in the lack of
legitimate speculative position limits in COMEX silver, contrary to
commodity law. If you are a shareholder in CDE, HL, PAAS, or any other
silver producer, and you have not demanded yet that their CEO's make
inquiries into this sordid affair, you are missing something that may
benefit you greatly.
Some people have asked me, how can the dealers, crooked or not, pull off
such a feat? Or more precisely, how can the dealers buy back such
amounts on a decline in price, as short covering connotes rising prices?
The answer is the brain-dead technical funds. They buy on the way up,
and they sell on the way down. They don't care about values. They care
only if the price is moving up or down - nothing else. It is the tech
funds mindless and indiscriminate selling that has allowed the dealers
to buy back their own shorts on lower prices. The dealers have picked
the funds pockets clean, once again. This article is getting longer than
I intended, so I ask you to read a piece I did a year ago, that
describes the COT - http://www.investmentrarities.com/08-14-01.html
Remarkably, this previous article describes just where we are also at
now in the current condition of the COT.
This is the good news that I referred to. For the first time in almost a
year, we have finally entered a "good zone" on the COT. Let me be clear
on this. For all of this year, the dealers were net short big in silver.
That is why I complained to the CFTC repeatedly. They are not short big
now. The tech funds are. That means the path of least resistance is up.
It means sell-offs from here are likely to be shallow and brief. It
means that the "bad guys" are configured for the market to go up. It
means we have explosive price potential. I can't tell you when the all
clear signal will be flashed. Perhaps it will be when the big Dec
silver/gold option expiration comes, four weeks from now. Perhaps it
will come tomorrow. I can't tell you when the last new technical fund
short (and resultant lower low) will be put on. But I can tell you when
we get in the extremely favorable structure we are now in, good things
happen on the upside. Perversely, I can tell you that this very
favorable current COT structure has come about precisely because of the
very bad recent price action, which was caused by the tech fund selling.
Now, we are once again at the critical juncture. The market structure is
saying that the dealers may be in the best position they can possibly be
in, for silver to rocket higher and them to sustain minimal damage. It
is at times like this when our expectations should be the highest they
can be. It is true, that every single time we have been at this juncture
before, the dealers have turned aggressive sellers on the resultant
rally and have dashed the bulls' hopes. This is the essence of the
silver manipulation. It is also true, however, that a market in a
deficit will inevitably have to explode in price at some point,
especially if there have been artificial price constraints. So this may
be it. It comes down to - will the dealers cap it with uneconomic short
sales, especially after all the attention they have garnered this year.
I don't know. I have tried my best to shine the light on the COMEX. But considering the low risk/high reward created by the current
COT, you got to play it like it's the real move - for one simple reason.
If it turns out to be the real move, you won't get a second chance. Not
at these prices. Good luck.
|