|
Archives
TED
BUTLER'S ARCHIVES
WEEKLY COMMENTARY
September 6, 2005
Every Picture Tells A Story
By Theodore Butler
(This essay was written by silver analyst Theodore Butler, an
independent consultant. Investment Rarities does not necessarily endorse
these views, which may or may not prove to be correct.)
Even though there is almost too much to write about in silver, I have
to force myself to do so, given the overwhelming enormity of the
nation’s greatest natural disaster. It seems shallow to write about
silver in light of this tragedy. My heart goes out to those suffering
and my admiration to those helping. This will be a long recovery process
and we must all do what we can to help our fellow Americans. While many
seem preoccupied with assigning blame, I doubt that is constructive.
What would be constructive would be for those of us who are not victims
to count our blessings and pitch in and help on any way possible.
That would certainly include sharing any material bounty that might
come our way by virtue of silver investment gains. Based upon recent
developments, those gains might be closer than otherwise expected. The
first development is in the market structure, as defined by the
Commitment of Traders Report (COT).
The most recent silver COT was shockingly bullish. Every category
exhibited positive changes, but the standout was the stunning increase
in the tech funds’ short position, which doubled to an extreme not seen
in a couple of years. It appears the recent shakeout in silver just may
be the final one, as the tech funds’ apparently took the dealers’ bait
and fully committed to the short side.
Not only was there an increase in the large tech funds’ existing
short positions, but there was also a notable increase in the number of
tech funds jumping on the short side of silver. Since these brain dead
tech funds stand absolutely no chance of delivering actual silver
against their short positions, it’s just a matter of when and at what
price they rush to buy back these shorts. Make no mistake; there was
nothing accidental about the recent sell-off to new lows in silver. It
was designed to lure the tech funds onto the short side. A more bullish
COT structure is hard to imagine.
It appears that the dealers have succeeded in transferring a sizable
portion of the short liability to the hapless tech funds. The funds are
potentially trapped. Now we await the resolution. As always, the price
action will depend upon how aggressive the dealers are in selling short
on the next rally. If they don’t short aggressively, the price of silver
will explode. If the dealers do short aggressively on the next rally,
the gains will be much more subdued.
In gold, there was a large improvement in the just-reported COT
report on the sharp price decline below the 50 moving average on the
last reporting day, Tuesday, August 30. But even with this improvement
the gold market structure can hardly be labeled as bullish, particularly
when considering the subsequent deterioration from the cut-off. It’s
still a case of the gold COTs being in dangerous territory, while silver
is in a spectacularly bullish configuration. As mentioned previously, it
is an unprecedented dichotomy.
As exciting and important as the COT market structure may be, it is
not the only noteworthy development in silver. There were also unusual
developments in warehouse stock movements and the first few days’
deliveries in the big September COMEX contract. On two days, over 4
million ounces of silver were brought in to the COMEX warehouses. While
many still assume an increase in COMEX inventories is bearish, I don’t
agree. This silver was brought in because it had to be brought in, to
satisfy delivery demands. If there was available silver to deliver
readily in the warehouses already, more wouldn’t be brought in.
Certainly, the price action seemed to confirm and did not negate my
bullish interpretation, as price rose strongly immediately after the
inventory addition.
The actual number of deliveries over the first few days were the
largest in more than a year, also confirming overall physical silver
demand. More importantly, the largest stopper, or taker of deliveries,
was none other than AIG, who had virtually disappeared from COMEX silver
delivery dealings, after long dominating such activities.
Those are the facts; now I’d like to speculate. Recently, I wrote
that I noticed a significant increase in the commercials’ gross long
position and remarked how that could indicate coming physical delivery
demands. In trying to guess which commercials might be responsible for
these new long positions, I must admit I did not think of AIG first.
My first thoughts were it could be preparatory silver buying for the
pending silver ETF. After all, the quantities and timing of the unusual
commercial buying seemed to coincide with the filing of the preliminary
prospectus for the Barclays’ silver ETF. The buying commenced within
days of the June 17th filing of the prospectus. Now, I know
the silver ETF may never be approved, as I wrote in "The Coming Silver
ETF?" but a close reading of the prospectus indicates that Barclays can
not issue shares in the silver ETF, even if approved, without first
owning and possessing actual silver.
Therefore, Barclays cannot wait for regulatory approval before making
arrangements to get the real silver. It must have a decent quantity of
silver in place before regulatory approval, as the announcement of
approval alone, if it comes, will impact the price of silver. I still
think the silver ETF will be bullish for silver whether it is approved
or not, because it will prove how scarce real silver is in either event.
Either ETF buying (or conversion from futures to actuals) will propel
silver upward, or the denial by regulators will only come because they
know the real silver doesn’t exist to back the fund. The denial of even
a single silver ETF will prove to all just how rare silver is compared
to gold, where many ETFs haven’t impacted the price. Even the most
casual observer will have to conclude that silver is much rarer than
gold if the regulators deny even one measly silver ETF, compared to the
many in gold, no matter what the spin.
I still think the silver ETF may be behind some of the commercial
futures buying, and note with interest that, if true, it highlights how
the COMEX is where silver must be bought, as there is very little silver
available in London or elsewhere. After all, why buy under the relative
glare of COMEX transparency, when you can do so in the much more
secretive London or Zurich venues? Especially when the prospectus calls
for London storage.
But the sudden appearance of AIG as the major delivery stopper, after
such a long and conspicuous absence, creates another possibility. (Izzy,
my silver Godfather, from the start of the unusual commercial buying,
favored this other possibility even before AIG’s name turned up in the
delivery process). Considering the regulatory hot water that AIG has
found itself in over the past year or so, this is one corporation that
you can be sure is walking the legal straight and narrow. It is
inconceivable that AIG would do anything cute at this particular time.
For them to show up as a notable silver delivery participant after all
their legal troubles and past allegations by me of wrongdoing in the
silver market, means AIG has a compelling reason to do so.
This is speculation on my part (actually on Izzy’s part), but the
compelling reason why AIG must take delivery of silver is because it is
obligated to do so, by virtue of prior lease obligations to Red China.
Quite simply, China may want its silver back and AIG must return it. AIG
is procuring it from the COMEX, also in the full glare of transparency,
as that is the last remaining place to get quantities of silver. If this
speculation is close to being true, you can be sure that the quantities
of silver needed to be returned involve a lot more silver than the 8.5
million ounces of silver taken by AIG in the first few days of the
September delivery.
Maybe it’s for the ETF, maybe it’s for lease returns by AIG, or maybe
it’s both, but if this is why the commercials are buying silver futures
in unusual quantities, this puts real pressure on the physical market
for silver. It promises continued delivery pressure in the future.
Combined with the extreme COT readings, this is a very volatile and
bullish brew. With silver still below the primary cost of production, it
is not a time to be shy about being on the long side.
On a personal note, I’ve fallen badly behind on my e-mails. I read
them all, but haven’t been able to respond to many, particularly those
requiring detailed responses. If you don’t mind, please resend your note
if you really need a response. |