|
Archives
TED
BUTLER'S ARCHIVES
WEEKLY COMMENTARY
July 12, 2005
YOU DO THE MATH
By Theodore Butler
Here’s a recent e-mail exchange between a reader and myself. It was
in reaction to some of my recent articles that mentioned gold being more
abundant than silver.
Reader: Are you saying that silver is rarer than gold in absolute
terms?…
I understand, in terms of silver in the ground and the rate of use,
that in some sort of relative terms silver is rarer than gold. But you
seem to be saying that in absolute terms silver bullion is rarer than
gold bullion.
Do I understand you correctly? It seems impossible that silver, which
is an industrial as well as a precious metal, would be rarer than
gold in absolute terms and yet cost only 1/60th as much. Has the sil-ver manipulation
actually distorted prices to this degree? I am sure others are as
confused as I about this. It does not seem to make sense. Was there a
typo in your article? Or have I made some horrendous error in my math
(that is quite possible).
Butler: "Yes, that is exactly what I am saying and have been
saying all along. The very first article I wrote for Investment Rarities
in November 2000 had that issue as the central point. Check it out –
TED
BUTLER'S ARCHIVES
"I understated the real figures in the article because I was talking
about known silver bullion vs. known gold bullion. Bottom line- there is
3 to 5 times as much gold in the world than silver on a physical ounce
by ounce basis, so silver is much rarer than gold. But when you put a
dollar amount on it, the relationship goes through the roof. In dollar
terms gold is 200 to 300 times greater in value than silver. I've
written many articles on this, so perhaps I wasn't clear enough and will
try harder in the future. In simple terms, anyone who owns gold in lieu
of silver needs to have his head examined."
I would like to expand on this theme a bit, namely, why I feel that
silver is a much better holding than gold. First, let me assure you that
I approach this controversial issue with constructive intentions. The
last thing I want to do is to insult my gold friends. I harbor the best
of intentions to them by suggesting that they move some of their gold
into silver. First, I believe that one’s capital will grow more in
silver than it will in gold. I think there are many advisors who believe
this, yet are hesitant to say so, for fear of offending gold investors.
Instead, they say you should hold both gold and silver. I disagree with
that. Gold and silver are not one and the same, and it is reasonable to
assume they will have different performance results in the future.
Analysts should be clear in their expectations for either.
Second, because we have not witnessed any tremendous price
performance difference in the past few years between gold and silver,
gold investors haven’t missed the boat yet by not switching to silver.
In other words, because gold and silver prices have generally climbed by
the same amount since I have been writing these reports, there hasn’t
been much gained or lost by being over weighted in one or the other.
That will change dramatically, in my opinion, in favor of silver. But
for now, gold investors can still get just as much silver for their gold
as they could when silver was $4. That’s a great opportunity.
Third, by making the switch from gold to silver, gold investors may
actually help to boost the price of gold. That’s because even the
smallest flow of gold money into silver would set the price of silver
flying, which, in turn, should impact the price of gold. As I have
written before, the value of one-half of one percent of the world’s gold
comes to an amount greater than 100% of the value of all the silver in
the world. Those numbers are so profound, they may be difficult to
comprehend. Once you understand them, you may not hesitate to switch
gold into silver.
Although I have been writing of the rarity of silver compared to gold
for years now, the numbers in total dollar terms are so staggering, you
can’t grasp the enormity of it.
That’s what I think happened to my e-mail friend above. How can an
item so rare be worth such a small fraction of the more plentiful item?
There is nothing in your life’s experience to reconcile this with. This
is new stuff. Your only hope of grasping it is to go someplace quiet
with a pencil and paper and play with the numbers.
There are 4 to 5 billion ounces of gold in the world (according to
the World Gold Council and others), half a billion to a billion ounces
of silver (according to the Silver Institute and others). You know the
current prices. Do the calculations. Here’s what you’ll find. There is
more than $2 trillion worth of gold in the world. That’s $2,000 billion.
That amount increases daily, at current prices, as new gold is added to
inventory. There is no more than $7 billion worth of silver in the
world, at current prices, and everyday there is less silver in the
world, due to the deficit.
One half of one percent of $2 trillion is $10 billion. Therefore, the
total dollar value of all the silver in the world is less than one half
of one percent of the total dollar value of all the gold in the world.
If silver were to triple in price, and gold’s price remained unchanged,
the value of silver would still only be worth 1% of gold’s total value.
On a per capita basis, there is more than $300 worth of gold for each of
the 6 billion people in the world, versus little more than $1 in silver.
You have been taught, and know intuitively, that something more rare
than something else must be more expensive. That is not the case with
gold and silver. In addition, the substance more rare is a vital
necessity in modern life, while the more plentiful item is basically a
luxury. That the rarer, needed and disappearing material is priced
incorrectly is what presents the opportunity of a lifetime.
Either these numbers and my thinking are wrong, or the price of
silver is wrong. If you think I am right, then the trick, of course, is
to absorb that knowledge and act on it before the masses catch on. I can
tell you that very few people realize that silver is rarer than gold, or
that all the silver in the world is worth less than one half of one
percent of the world’s gold. Certainly, I would never publish numbers or
facts that I knew to be incorrect. But it is up to you to verify my
calculations and assertions. If you take the time to do the math, I
think you will be compelled to buy silver.
(This essay was written by silver analyst Theodore Butler, an
independent consultant. Investment Rarities does not necessarily endorse
these views, which may or may not prove to be correct.)
This memo was distributed to IRI brokers Thursday morning, July 7.
July 6, 2005
To: All Brokers
From: Ted Butler
In a conversation with Jim Cook today, he suggested that what I was
thinking was so important that I should put my thoughts in writing. I
think we have flushed out the tech fund longs in silver, with
constructive dealer short covering. The same goes for gold, although
it’s possible for gold to work a bit lower. What Jim was most interested
in were some comments I made on the dollar versus the other currencies,
which I don’t normally write about.
First off, I’m not a currency maven and don’t pretend to be one. A
man’s got to know his limitations (Dirty Harry, I believe, said that).
But I do see what could be a rare and powerful alignment of planets and
stars and I’d like to get it off my chest.
There is a question in my mind as to whether currencies influence the
metals, or vice-versa, but there usually is a connection that suggests a
weak dollar coincides with strong metals. This relationship is soon to
reassert itself in a big way. It all has to do with the tech funds and
momentum players.
Around March 10th this year, the dollar made a significant
low and gold and silver recorded a high for the year. So far, so good.
At that time, the tech funds were massively short the dollar (their
biggest market) and massively long gold and silver. Since that time, the
dollar has risen 10% (a very big move) and the metals, coincidentally,
are down almost about the same percentage.
Because of the dollar rally over the past four months, the tech funds
closed out all their shorts and have gotten massively long the dollar
(short the currencies) and have now abandoned their long positions in
the metals. Therefore, market structure suggests major dollar weakness
and metals strength straight ahead – simply because the tech funds and
momentum players are on the wrong side once again.
If the dollar starts to tank and the metals soar, all sorts of
nonsensical reasons will be given, centering around the demise of the
dollar and the end of the world. The real reason will be that the brain
dead tech funds were snookered once again – no more, no less. The
important thing is that silver should do extremely well, dead ahead. The
COTs will see to that. |