|
Archives
TED
BUTLER'S ARCHIVES
TED BUTLER COMMENTARY
May 17, 2006
The Final Wash Out?
(This essay was written by silver analyst Theodore Butler, an
independent consultant. Investment Rarities does not necessarily endorse
these views, which may or may not prove to be correct.)
It is truly amazing how much silver–related news and price volatility
have been generated lately. Because of that I find myself, once again,
unable to personally respond to the large volume of e-mails seeking
comment. I have even been so rude as to be unable to respond to those
who have sent thank you’s, or really good questions or to those who seek
to send me money for my subscription service, which may exist someday,
but does not currently. Please accept my apology. I can assure you that
I read and appreciate everything sent to me, and I will try to publicly
address that which I can’t respond to privately.
For today, however, I will postpone attempting to respond to the
issues most frequently mentioned, in order to deal with the two-dollar
sell-off in the price of silver in as many days. A few weeks back I
wrote that I thought we were forming a bottom based upon the tech fund
long liquidation and reciprocal dealer short covering that had taken
place. (Please see "A Long Time Coming.") I still feel that way, as that
liquidation process has continued. In fact, the recent sell-off still
leaves us at levels higher than the previous lows.
This most recent silver sell-off took place within the confines of a
sharp break in price in other metals, with silver declining more sharply
than the others. This is ironic as silver has the most powerfully
bullish characteristics currently than any other metal or industrial
commodity, including crude oil. Let’s see if I can back that statement
up.
The first place where silver stands head and shoulders above any
other metal or industrial metal is in its internal structure, as defined
by the Commitment of Traders Report (COT). No other commodity even comes
close to silver’s bullish configuration. The most recent COT indicates
that the tech funds and the small speculators have been largely flushed
out of long positions and the dealers (especially the very biggest) have
covered a large portion of their short positions. This has been the
reason why silver has sold off.
What makes the current spectacularly bullish COT configuration in
silver all the more remarkable is that I can find no other metal with
any similar type of bullish structure. Copper is neutral, while gold’s
COT is actually on the bearish side. Crude oil is extremely bearish. (Of
course, it must be remembered that when the COTs prove to be "wrong" it
is always in predicting tops). But it is unusual for silver to have such
an extreme opposite COT configuration from gold, and I only remember it
occurring once before. In short, the silver COTs are saying that silver
is washed out on the downside, especially compared to the other
commodities.
Normally, a bullish COT is all I’ve ever needed to advocate an
aggressive exposure in silver, given that the fundamentals have been
consistently favorable. And that is certainly the case now. Long-term
readers know the accuracy of the COT at bottoms. But it is not just the
bullish COT that advocates an aggressive exposure to silver at this
time.
The Death Star
In addition to the great COT structure, an extraordinary new bullish
factor has been injected into the silver equation – the silver ETF (SLV).
In just the first 12 trading days of SLV, almost 70 million ounces has
been purchased, or more than half of the total amount (130 million
ounces) originally filed for with the SEC. This is real silver taken off
the market and the amount purchased so far has exceeded anyone’s
expectations.
While I am surprised that so much silver has been purchased to date
with so little (yet) impact on price, the great thing is that we are
being made aware of how much silver has been in the unknown category at
the very same time it is being effectively taken off the market. If I
had to learn that there was more silver in the unknown category than I
might have anticipated, there could be no better way of learning that
than by seeing it absorbed into the ETF. Silver flowing into the ETF
should basically stay there (and be unavailable to the market) for a
long time, just like the silver in the Central Fund of Canada.
Because the ETF buys real silver in large quantities, I have
variously referred to it as the Great White Shark, or perfect
silver-eating machine, or as the doomsday machine for the shorts. A
friend of mine, Carl Loeb, came up with the most appropriate analogy, in
my opinion, when he dubbed the ETF as the Death Star of the silver
market, likening it to the powerful weapon from the movie Star Wars. I
believe that does not overstate the impact this silver ETF will come to
have on the silver market. What promises to turn this ETF into the Death
Star is the multi-dimensional havoc it can unleash, setting off a number
of chain reactions.
Overnight, the silver ETF is the largest buyer of silver in the
world, buying a quantity, in a matter of days, what would normally take
a year (or years) by the very largest industrial consumers. And don’t
think this isn’t the same as industrial consumption, as the net effect
is the same, namely, silver is taken off the market. I think the other
industrial consumers are aware of this new kid on the block (that’s why
the Silver Users Association fought the ETF) and it is only a matter of
time before the users do the only practical thing they can, and that’s
to buy silver for inventory purposes.
Once the users rush to build inventories, as they surely will and
always do at the first sign of shortage, the mile-long string of
firecrackers will go off. Decades of just-in-time inventory disposal
guarantees that this will occur. What user is not aware of the
shortages, delays and high prices that have befallen those users with no
inventories or forward buying contracts in other metals and industrial
commodities?
Separately, institutional investors have been given a gift in this
ETF, with their newfound ability to invest in real silver. The typical
mutual or hedge fund, or bank trust department or family office would
never have invested in futures or with a coin dealer. But an
exchange-listed security is right up their alley.
More importantly, as Loeb has pointed out to me, the very act of an
institutional investor buying shares of SLV (because it causes the
automatic purchase and removal of real silver from the market) has the
singular and unique impact of making the fundamentals of the real silver
market better. Normally, the purchase of a common stock may temporarily
impact the price of any stock upward, but does nothing to improve the
underlying company’s condition. With an ETF that buys the actual metal,
the underlying condition of the metal is improved, in addition to the
normal and temporary upward impact. As more institutions comprehend this
important distinction and act on it, the effect could be profound.
In addition, institutional investors are being given, for the very
first time in history, the ability to invest in the real deal, the
actual metal, at precisely what may also turn out to be the best time
possible. The ETF offers the first true alternative to what has
previously been the only way that institutional investors could have
invested in the silver space, namely, silver mining company equity
shares. And while it is no secret that silver mining equities greatly
outperformed the metal itself in the early days of the silver bull
market, which commenced several years ago, more recently the actual
metal has begun to outperform the equities. Even though I expect this to
continue, at the very least, it is always better to have the ability to
choose for oneself.
No matter which approach to silver an institutional investor takes,
equity or ETF, the choice is being presented at an interesting time in
the silver world. Aside from the fact that the very largest producers of
silver are generally large diversified metal miners where silver makes
up a small portion of total revenues, making it hard to invest in a pure
silver play, there seems to be a rash of new developments that threaten
the future profits of silver miners, even if the price of silver
explodes. Some of these developments include;
- Threats of nationalization and increased taxes
- Rapid increases in costs of production, including energy
- Depletion of ore bodies
- Impediments to mining for environmental and local concerns
- Management miscalculations, including ill-timed hedging
- Severe dilution, through share issuance
- Large up-front investment and lead times for production
Obviously, the institutional investor does not have to concern
himself with these matters should he decide to deal with the ETF,
instead of mining shares. Remarkably, most of these risks and fears are
limited to the mining shares and actually enhance the prospects for the
metal itself, as any impediment to future production only increases the
value of the finished product. And dilution is not an issue for the
silver ETF, as metal must be purchased and stored for each new share
issued. If I were an institutional investor who decided on establishing
or increasing an exposure to silver, I can’t imagine not choosing the
ETF.
I have a high confidence that institutional investors will come to
appreciate the great opportunity being presented to them with the
introduction of the silver ETF. But I hope they appreciate that there
may be a very narrow window of time to avail themselves of this
opportunity. Already, more than half the shares authorized have been
placed. There is no guarantee that there will be enough silver
available, at near current prices, for completion of the offering. In
the event of a sell-out, there can be no assurance of future additional
silver ETFs, creating the likelihood of a large premium developing on
the existing shares of SLV.
The bottom line is that there is an awful lot of institutional
investment money out there and very little real silver remaining. The
ETF has created a conduit between those two simple facts for the first
time in history. That’s what makes the silver ETF the Death Star.
As I was submitting this article, on Wednesday morning, May 17, I
noticed an extreme deterioration in the gold/silver ratio, with silver
under performing not only gold, but also virtually every other metal.
While I have studiously avoided publicly recommending anyone trade the
gold/silver spread on a leveraged basis, I can easily understand why
someone would buy silver and sell gold from a valuation viewpoint and
end up doing the silver/gold spread on a very leveraged basis.
My sense is that the dealer/manipulators on the COMEX have pulled out
all the stops in attempting to force liquidation of those holding these
spreads. Their object, of course, is to shake as many silver long
holders out of the market, thereby allowing the dealers to further
reduce their short silver positions. Unfortunately for those holding
such spreads, the dealers appear to be succeeding with what may be their
final wash out of silver longs in any form.
I want to emphasize that this silver/gold liquidation is very blatant
and very bullish for silver, when it is completed. You don’t have to be
Albert Einstein to see what the dealers are doing, or know their real
motive. For long term investors of all types, retail and institutional
alike, I would like to reaffirm my suggestion that gold only investors
take advantage of the dealers’ actions and the aberration in the
silver/gold spread to establish long term silver positions, using gold
as a source of funds. This applies particularly to those institutional
investors with gold ETF positions and no silver ETF positions. |