|
Archives
WEEKLY COMMENTARY
January 7th, 2003
2002 - 2003
SILVER REVIEW AND OUTLOOK
By Theodore Butler
January 2003
The following essay was written by silver analyst Theodore Butler.
Investment Rarities does not necessarily endorse these views, which may
or may not prove to be correct.)
The silver market in 2002 was somewhat uneventful.
Certainly, from a price perspective, things were not too exciting
(unless you used the opportunity to accumulate). Prices ended the year
where they began, at roughly $4.70 per ounce. That’s where they were in
1990, and about what the price has averaged since then. Because the vast
majority of people buy as prices move up, silver is not yet on the
public's radar screen. That means the public hasn't bid the price up.
Since they have not yet accumulated silver, they are not in a position
to dump it and drive down the price. The continued low price of silver
suggests a low level of risk to the downside.
This subdued price pattern for silver has lasted
almost two decades. (I claim that the leasing and COMEX short selling
manipulation began in 1983.) Most folks are not aware that, in the
decade prior to 1983, silver was the most volatile commodity. Since then
it has become the least volatile of the metals. This has occurred
despite continued physical deficits, and the depletion of some 1.5
billion ounces. This swing from most to least volatile, amid a
documented deficit, provides clear proof that the price has been
manipulated. Nothing else in economics can explain this phenomenon.
Even though the price action was subdued, 2002 was a
remarkable year in silver. For one thing, the U.S. Government finally
exhausted the last of its once-gigantic silver stockpile. It dropped
from six billion ounces to zero in 60 years. Never again will the
government be able to manage the silver deficit by subsidizing the
silver industrial users with taxpayer owned material. Never again will
Uncle Sam be able to sell, or even threaten to sell, real silver to
thwart a price rally. From 2002 until eternity, the U.S. Government can
only be a buyer or a bystander, but never a seller of real silver. Sure,
they can assist and sanction rule changes hurting paper holders of
silver, but they can’t hurt those who own real silver.
As of December 31, the US Mint has reported total
silver Eagle sales of 10,475,500 for the year, the largest total since
1987. I would guess Proof Eagles and the various commemorative coinage
programs probably added another 3 million ounces. Disappointingly, and
perhaps instructively, the expected commemorative silver coin for the
9/11 tragedy died quietly in the Senate, even though it was expected to
pass easily. My speculation? The Silver Users Association, realizing the
potential huge demand for silver this coin would create, got to its key
legislators to kill the bill.
Putting these 2002 Eagle sales figures into
perspective, in a year when silver prices were flat, and gold prices
rose close to 25%, one would think silver coin sales would be weak
relative to gold coin sales. Instead, the opposite occurred. In fact,
taking the average annual coin sales of each, in total ounces, from the
very beginning of the American Eagle Coin program in 1986 through the
end of 2001, Silver Eagle sales in 2002 were 71% greater than the prior
16 year average, while Gold Eagle sales in 2002 were almost 60% lower
than the prior 16 year annual average. That's incredible. My conclusion
is that a small, but growing number of thoughtful investors are
recognizing just how valuable real silver is, and are voting with their
wallets.
Most noteworthy in 2002 was the deficit of 100
million ounces between production and consumption of silver. This drew
down and depleted another 100 million ounces of silver inventory. And
while the world's economy slowed down, silver consumption in 2002 gave a
good account of itself. Photographic usage held it's own, with silver
demand about the same as the prior year, according to figures released
by Eastman Kodak and Fuji Photo Film. The digital photographic
revolution continued with remarkable little effect on silver
consumption. In fact, the digital process spurred heavy demand for
glossy photo paper (it contains silver), for home printers and
professional photo finishers. In the rapidly-growing less developed
world, silver-halide photography is exploding. In China, Kodak's second
largest market, there has been a fierce price war on film for years, as
film companies fight for market share. China will soon be the largest
film market in the world. Recently, the leading local brand, China's
Lucky Film Co., cut film prices by 30%. Nothing stimulates overall
demand and consumption for an item like a price war.
The continued exportation of silver from China
remains a hot topic. I have contended that silver exports have come from
China as a result of leasing from the People’s Republic of China Central
Bank, and recycling and smelting that was formerly done in other
countries. However, with a robust economy, and the world's largest
population, China will soon be the major consumer and importer of
silver. This year China became the second largest manufacturer of
computer hardware. China also became the largest cell phone market (with
over 200 million handsets). China became the fourth largest automobile
market (after the U.S., Germany and Japan), and will become the second
largest in three years. All these products require silver. China moved
ahead of Japan as the second largest consumer of oil and copper. All the
facts mentioned are related to demographics. Because silver is
demographically sensitive, it’s just a matter of time before China, with
its huge population, is the world’s largest consumer and importer of
silver.
World industrial consumption of silver usually
changes little from year to year. While we have had soft world economic
conditions this year, overall demand for copper and industrial metals
seems relatively strong. When you see oil, copper and aluminum demand
remain steady, you can assume silver demand is also steady.
In jewelry, silver has weathered soft economic times
with flying colors. Because there has been no price change this year,
there has been no reason for silver jewelry demand to fall off. In fact,
demand for silver jewelry has increased as a result of people stepping
down from higher priced gold and platinum. Tiffany & Company reports a
falloff from higher priced jewelry to lower priced silver items, thus
keeping the company's sales steady. Go into a Tiffany's store someday
and you'll likely see more people in the silver section than in the gold
and diamond sections. This is a trend that this company has reported for
years. Let's face it, there will always be demand for jewelry. You can
"step down" from diamonds to pearls, or from platinum to gold, but you
can't step down from silver and still be in precious metals.
In silver production (as with demand), drastic
changes don’t occur from year to year. It takes a long time and massive
financial resources to bring a major mine onstream. There are very few
stand-alone silver mines. Currently, silver mine production is the
highest it's been in the history of the world. Silver recycling also
sits at peak levels. Silver mine production set a record because the
world needs the minerals that silver is associated with in the earth's
crust (copper, zinc, lead and gold). We know that 75% of silver mine
production in 2002 came as a byproduct. An enormous increase in base
metal production came about over the past two decades to keep up with
demand. That accounts for record levels of silver production.
Low prices for copper, lead and zinc, and sharply
increased warehouse stocks, mean we currently have a surplus in these
metals. Inventories of copper, lead and zinc are the highest in five
years, with lead stocks almost doubling in the past year, and zinc
stocks up 50% for the year. Prices for each remain near decade-long
lows, and major producers report losses. Talk of production cutbacks and
delays in new projects are common. While warehouse stocks for copper,
lead and zinc have reached high levels over the past five years, silver
warehouse stocks (COMEX) are down 70% from levels of the mid 1990s and
have remained stable (with the exception of a one-time addition) for the
past five years. Record production of copper, lead and zinc have
resulted in low prices and heavy inventories, while record production of
silver has resulted in low prices and smaller inventories. It makes no
sense. Low inventories make it inevitable that the price will rise.
To summarize, we saw record production of silver in
2002 and record, or near record demand. We had another year of deficit.
We had less silver remaining in inventories than we’ve had in hundreds
of years. Silver has been transformed from a commodity that accumulates,
like gold, to a commodity that gets consumed. That’s the main difference
between the two. Gold stays with us. Silver gets used up and is gone
forever. This year we had the lowest inflation adjusted price for silver
in history. In addition, China perversely dumped official silver,
satisfying the deficit temporarily, while moving to become the largest
silver consumer ever.
Will 2003 be the year that silver breaks free from
the manipulative grip? The signs are strong that we are at the bottom of
the inventory barrel. Frankly, I thought it would have exploded long
ago. While no one can guarantee when the silver price will go up
dramatically, there are some powerful factors currently impacting
silver. While there is always the risk of a sell off in silver, as the
technical funds and dealers battle it out on the COMEX, the chance of
getting hurt by a steep decline in real silver from current levels is
basically nonexistent. The guarantee that comes with silver stems from
the law of supply and demand, a commodity in a deficit must eventually
rise in price to eliminate that deficit. The neat thing about that
guarantee is that it becomes stronger the longer the deficit has
existed. At 60 years, and counting, the silver deficit comes with the
strongest guarantee ever created by basic laws of supply and demand. Of
course, the guarantee only applies if you own real silver.
There’s one additional note on the COMEX. While
prices were basically flat this year, we ended the year with a
mini-delivery drama in the December COMEX silver futures contract. I
confess to over-analysis of the details, but in studying delivery
patterns on the COMEX for more than 15 years, I saw something in the
just concluded December contract that I have never witnessed before.
There were an unusually large number of open contracts until almost the
end of trading on December 27. The longs had held their contracts since
before first delivery day on November 27, and were waiting for the
shorts to make delivery (the shorts can deliver anytime they want, but
must deliver by the last trading day). What I saw, or more correctly,
what I think I saw, based upon the delivery and trading patterns of the
month, and changes in warehouse stocks in the COMEX warehouses, was an
inability to deliver 500 to 600 contracts (2.5 to 3 million ounces of
real silver). This resulted in a negotiated transfer of this delivery
requirement to the March contract. I'm sensitive to this issue because I
have been personally involved in a similar delivery situation (not
silver). If my speculation is correct, the CFTC and COMEX management
were involved in the negotiation, which meant convincing the long
holders to not disrupt the market, and defer their delivery of physical
silver until March. Again, if I'm correct, three things come to mind.
One, the CFTC is speaking with a forked tongue when it says anyone can
take delivery of COMEX silver whenever they like. Two, this may be the
first warning shot to paper longs looking to take delivery and convert
to physical. Three, tightness in the physical market will start a price
rise. Silver is acting like it’s in short supply, with a lot of people
trying to hide that fact. Once silver starts it’s run, get out of the
way. Nothing will stop it.
* * * * *
Editor’s note: The Dow-Jones newswire recently quoted
Ted Butler as follows: "If you look under the hood at what makes the
market tick, you will see that silver is much more compelling than gold.
But you have to do your homework." Butler pointed out that most people
don’t realize despite the huge price discrepancies, silver is actually
rarer than gold. "At this moment there is actually more gold above
ground than silver," said Butler, explaining that while almost all of
the gold ever mined is still in circulation, silver supplies tend to be
exhausted as most silver applications are such that the metal cannot be
easily retrieved."
|